Zitat: |
The general rules, the rules in the Emissaries & Inquisitors- (and/or Inquisitors & Emissaries-) set, the “Karten-FAQ” (in German: http://www.blue-moon-fans.com/dload.php?action=category&cat_id=3 ) and Chris Dearloves FAQ ( http://www.mnemosyne.demon.co.uk/bgames/bluemoon/faq.txt ) current at the time of the tournament are valid. |
Zitat: |
Q: Are there any secret rules to the game Blue Moon?
A: Yes. If you are playing against someone whose name is mentioned in the Blue Moon rules credits in a tournament, he attracts three dragons before the game starts. |
Xelethotiras hat folgendes geschrieben: |
Before the tournament I wanted to announce you ... like "Now say hello to our special guest Christopher Dearlove |
FAQ hat folgendes geschrieben: |
Q: If I have an active Mekarthas the Shrewd [Hoax 16, Aqua deck] ("Your
icons are ignored, except STOP.") and play Rout Retainers [Hoax 30, E&I:A deck] ("Now I may discard your active FREE cards.") do I discard any of your cards? A: No, you do not. The phrase "FREE cards" should be interpreted in the same way as "PROTECTED cards" (see the appropriate section above), that is as "cards with a FREE icon which is not ignored" and I do not have any such cards due to all my FREE icons being ignored. (Note that if you did not have Merkarthas the Shrewd all my cards with FREE icons would be discarded, whether active or not.) |
FAQ hat folgendes geschrieben: |
Q: How should the phrase "PROTECTED cards" be interpreted on cards such
as Mad Mike Magpie [Flit 13, Terrah deck] ("Your cards with icons are ignored, except Flit character cards and PROTECTED cards.")? A: This should be interpreted as "cards with a PROTECTED icon which is not ignored". ... |
Redamikanas hat folgendes geschrieben: |
There is at least one mistake concerning Metarkhas and Rout Retainers |
Zitat: |
You do discard all the FREE cards even if the FREE icon is ignored.
(because Sebastian said so |
Zitat: |
there is maybe a problem with your interpretation of cards being "PROTECTED"
Your interpretation may be true for Mad Mike, Provoque Earthquake, and so on but it surely doesn't apply to Rout Retainers. |
Zitat: |
there are some more problems... (well, at least one) for example concerning the REPLACE icon, Mad Mike and Impenetrable Fog (maybe even more cards), but I have to take a closer look at it bevor I can give you a final statement, resume, interpretation, what ever |
Dearlove hat folgendes geschrieben: |
I see your Sebastian and raise you a Reiner. |
Redamikanas hat folgendes geschrieben: |
So what you wanne tell us is, that "an active PROTECTED card" is a card that is actually using the effect of the icon, and that "a PROTECTED card" is simply a card that has a PROTECTED icon, is that correct? (because we were thinking that the "active" only describes the status of the card and not the status of the icon) |
Zitat: |
well, yet another tiny little extra ruling that we can add to the huge pile of extra rules that already exist. |
Dearlove hat folgendes geschrieben: |
...
If you like, in software terms, interpret "active PROTECTED card" as "active (PROTECTED card)". ... |